Albarqawi v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
1Opinion of the Court
DICKENSON, Justice.
The controlling question is whether an indictment should have been quashed because Appellant, who was in custody and had declined to appear before the grand jury on advice of counsel, was subpoenaed before the grand jury, interrogated without his lawyer’s knowledge, and then indicted. We hold the indictment is not void. None of Appellant’s answers to the Grand Jury’s questions were used at the time of trial, and there is no question raised as to the suppression of evidence.
Appellant, Abdelrahman Albarqawi, and his wife, April Albarqawi, were jointly indicted for murder in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. MandujanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. WongSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Navarro v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991
- Jefferson County Criminal District Attorney's Office v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989