Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 1, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-4209PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

STENGEL, District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a wrongful death and survival action under Pennsylvania law. The plaintiffs product liability claims against Kimberly-Clark Corporation relate to the defendant’s design and manufacture of a feeding tube. The feeding tube was placed in Regina Wagner’s body prior to her death. Kimberly-Clark filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs strict liability claim (Count II) and breach of warranty claim (Count III).11 will grant Kimberly-Clark’s motion to dismiss the breach of warranty claim, but I will deny Kimberly-Clark’s *313motion to dismiss the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. Dean Hedges v. United States of America Environmental Moorings InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. Harold Pinker, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Roche Holdings Ltd. Harold PinkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Smith v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Rosenberg v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. American Strategic Insurance Corp. v. TTI Outdoor Power Equipment, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
  4. BROWN v. C.R. BARD, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. GROSS v. COLOPLAST CORP.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API