Legal Opinion
GROSS v. COLOPLAST CORP.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 17, 2020No. 2:19-cv-04385Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CRYSTAL GROSS, et al. CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 19-4385 COLOPLAST CORP., et al. Baylson, J. January 17, 2020 MEMORANDUM I. Introduction and Factual History Plaintiffs sue Coloplast Corp. for the alleged manufacture and sale of a defective pelvic mesh product which was implanted in Plaintiff Crystal Gross in May of 2018. ECF 1, Compl. ¶¶ 11–12, 73.1 (Crystal Gross’s husband, Timothy Gross, is also a plaintiff. Id. ¶ 2.) Crystal Gross has suffered pain and injury from the mesh’s defects, and she has had to undergo multiple…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.