Legal Opinion

Soares v. Soares

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 1987No. 8615DC1241PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

The judgment from which this appeal is taken is not a final judgment by its own terms. In our opinion, however, the order that the marital home be sold involves a substantial right from which defendant is entitled to an immediate appeal. G.S. 1-277.

Defendant contends the trial judge erred in denying her claim for alimony based on abandonment. Abandonment is a legal conclusion which must be based upon factual findings supported by competent evidence. Patton v. Patton, 78 N.C. App. 247, 337 S.E. 2d 607 (1985), rev’d in part on other grounds, 318 N.C. 404, 348 S.E. 2d 593…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Patton v. PattonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. McIntosh v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Patton v. PattonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Turner v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Capps v. CappsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Helms v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Thomas v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API