Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. McIntosh

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 1985No. 8415DC546PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

The threshold issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in giving legal effect to the parties’ oral stipulations relating to the distribution of their marital property. The parties stipulated as follows: (1) that all property owned by them at the time they separated was marital property: (2) that the marital property was to be divided equally; (3) that the marital property was to be valued as of the date of their divorce; and (4) that they would each bear their own expense and costs of the proceedings. The parties were willing to leave the actual division…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eubanks v. EubanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Rickert v. RickertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Capps v. CappsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Podrebarac v. Horace, Talley, Pharr, & Lowndes, P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. Wiencek-Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Gangopadhyay v. GangopadhyayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. In Re Foreclosure of Deed of Trust From CooperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Talent v. TalentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API