Kiley v. Sward-Kemp Drug Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 9 N.W.2d 237. Certiorari to review an order of the industrial commission denying relator compensation.
Since the only question presented by the writ is whether the facts and the inferences reasonably to be drawn therefrom sustain the commission's finding that relator's injury did not arise out of and in the course of her employment, it becomes our duty to review the record in the light most favorable to what the statutory fact-finding body has determined them to be.
Miss Kiley resides at Marshall with her parents and during the time presently important was employed by respondent…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Barragar v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Moore v. J. A. McNulty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Loucks v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Kayser v. Carson Pirie Scott & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lee v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Larson v. Le MereSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Burke v. B. F. Nelson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Kennedy v. Thompson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Jonas v. LillybladSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.