Legal Opinion

Baoust v. Kraut

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided July 21, 1977PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Justice:

In this medical malpractice action, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Superior Court granting summary judgment to defendants.

I

Briefly, the relevant facts are these: On October 22,1972, plaintiff underwent a cra-niotomy, which is a surgical opening of the skull, at the hands of Doctors Rafael Yanez and William Kraut, both neurosurgeons. After the operation she experienced a discharge from the wound and antibiotic therapy was applied to stop the drainage. A bacteria culture taken at the time of the initial discharge did not reveal the presence of infection.

Apparently, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Di Filippo v. PrestonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  2. Hurtt v. GoleburnSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  3. Mechell v. PalmerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
  4. State v. WoodSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961
  5. Christian v. Wilmington General Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Delaware · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Walski v. TiesengaIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Closser v. Penn Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  3. Taylor v. HillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. Balan v. HornerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  5. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of New Castle County v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API