Legal Opinion

Balan v. Horner

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 2, 1998No. 82, 1997PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice:

This is an appeal from a jury verdict against a doctor in a medical malpractice case. The doctor argues that the Superior Court erred, among other things, by (i) allowing a gynecologist to testify as to the standard of care required of a general surgeon; and (ii) refusing to strike the gynecologist’s opinion that the standard of care had been breached, when that opinion allegedly was based only on the fact that the patient was injured during the surgery. We find that the Superior Court correctly applied the law and acted within its discretion in admitting the expert testimony.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Di Filippo v. PrestonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  2. Medical Center of Delaware, Inc. v. LougheedSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  3. Baoust v. KrautSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  4. Timblin v. Kent General Hosp.(Inc.)Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  5. McLain v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Green v. WeinerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  2. Norman v. All About Women, P.A.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2018
  3. Green v. St. Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  4. McNulty, Jr. v. Correct Care Solutions, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2017
  5. Miller v. Christiana Care Health Services, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API