Legal Opinion
City of Comer v. Seymour
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided May 19, 2008No. S08A0557PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENHAM, Justice.
Timothy Scott Seymour owned a home and an adjacent barn in an area zoned by the City of Comer (“Comer”) as residential. Seymour decided to operate a haunted house on the property in October 2007 to raise money for charity. On September 4, 2007, Seymour approached members of Comer’s city council informally about operating the haunted house and, based on that contact, believed there was no objection to the haunted house and no need for a zoning permit. The event was scheduled to occur on October 19, 20, 26, 27, and 31, 2007. On October 19,2007, Comer moved for a temporary…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Collins v. Lombard Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Randolph County v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Brown v. SpannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Turpen v. Rabun County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Babb v. Putnam CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
3Cited by10 opinions
- Georgia Department of Natural Resources v. Center for a Sustainable Coast, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2014
- Sexual Offender Registration Review Board v. BerzettSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Higdon v. HigdonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Bell v. RaffenspergerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
- Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. v. SamuelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.