Legal Opinion

Freeman v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 1992No. 19784PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

In a petition for post-conviction relief filed pro se in the district court under the Uniform Post-Conviction Procedure Act, I.C. §§ 19-4901 through -4911 (UPCPA), Robert Freeman alleged that his plea to the charges leading to his conviction could not stand because the state had violated the part of the plea agreement whereby Freeman would be entitled to a parole hearing at least every thirty months as prescribed by policies of the Commission of Pardons and Parole. 1 Freeman also alleged that he was entitled to post-conviction relief because he was being discriminated against by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. FreemanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Hanks v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. State v. CheneyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McKinney v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Martinez v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Evensiosky v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Gonzalez v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Cochran v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API