Legal Opinion

Houston v. City of Coquille

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 7, 2009No. 08-35037PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

We affirm on the ground Houston’s claims are barred by collateral estoppel. The validity of Officer Bryant’s stop and subsequent arrest of Houston was actually litigated and necessarily decided in a contested case hearing before the Oregon Department of Motor Vehicles. See Cole v. DMV, 336 Or. 565, 87 P.3d 1120, 1131 (2004). Though a DMV contested case hearing does have not collateral estoppel effect against the state in criminal proceedings, State v. Ratliff, 304 Or. 254, 259-60, 744 P.2d 247, 250 (1987), administrative license revocation proceedings may have such effect in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RatliffOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Supension of Driving Privileges of Cole v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services BranchOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Skeen v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fairbank v. UnderwoodDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API