Laughlin, Wood & Co. v. Cooney
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
(after stating the case as above).
We concur in the conclusion of. the learned trial judge that the fact that one or more of the residences in the neighborhood have been, in part, converted into apartments to be used as places of residence, and that one is used as a boarding house, is not such a ch'ange as to deny to the district, in which appellant proposes to establish and conduct its undertaking business and funeral parlor, the character of a strictly residential district. Saier v. Joy, 198 Mich. 295, 164 N. W. 507, L. R. A. 1918A, 825.
The question argued and presented for decision on this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Saier v. JoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Cunningham v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Hundley v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Higgins v. BlochSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Kinney v. Koopman & GerdesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Jack v. TorrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- White v. Luquire Funeral HomeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Mutual Service Funeral Homes v. FehlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Dawson v. LaufersweilerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Albright v. CrimIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.