Angov v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentThomas, Chief Judge
I would join the Second Circuit in resolving the issue before us. Unsworn, unauthenticated, hearsay letters — prepared for litigation by the government and not subject to any form of cross-examination— cannot form the sole basis for denying asylum to an otherwise qualified applicant. Therefore, I must respectfully dissent.
I
A
Five of our sister circuits have held that the government may not deny asylum solely on the basis of conclusory letters prepared for litigation in reliance on multiple layers of unauthenticated hearsay, without affording the petitioner some right of confronting the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Shrestha v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Aden v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Glory Obianuju Ezeagwuna v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Ramiro Cruz Espinoza v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Betty Jordan v. Kelly BinnsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.