Legal Opinion
United States v. Jose Amador-Galvan, AKA Jose Amador Pullido-Villarreal, United States of America v. Rodolfo Molina, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 22, 1993No. 92-10325, 92-10715PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:
Jose Amador-Galvan and Rodolfo Molina were convicted of conspiracy to possess "with intent to distribute over five kilograms of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and possession with intent to distribute 5 kilograms or more of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(l)(A)(ii)(II).
This opinion addresses the district court’s refusal to disclose the identities of non-witness confidential informants and exclusion of expert witness testimony on the unreliability of eyewitness testimony. We address all other issues in a separate memorandum disposition.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Manuel P. AmaralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Sixto Humberto Sanchez, United States of America v. Reyes Acebes Barajas, United States of America v. Richard T. TerronesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Estate of Henry Barabin v. Astenjohnson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Larry D. HallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. CordobaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Hugo RinconCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Darren Eugene HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.