Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Vossler

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 7, 1922No. 23,442PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Miami district court; Jabez 0. Rankin, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action for damages for breach of a promise of marriage. Plaintiff prevailed. On defendant’s motion, based on all the usual grounds, a new trial was granted. From that order granting a new trial, the plaintiff, on February 14, 1921, appealed to this court. Later, on February 21, 1921, plaintiff returned to the district court and presented a motion “to amend and correct” the order granting a new trial, “by showing what ground or grounds of the motion were sustained and what grounds were overruled.” On the same day this motion was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bruington v. WagonerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. City of Sedan v. ChurchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  3. Bruington v. WagonerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Hollingsworth v. Davis-Daly Estates Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Sanders v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Fulton v. Poston Bridge & Iron, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Riggs ex rel. Riggs v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Peoples National Bank v. CaseySupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  5. Wenzel v. Lysle Milling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API