Legal Opinion

Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 23, 2004No. C047257Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RAYE, Acting P. J.

The Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District (Golden Gate) seeks a peremptory writ of mandate compelling a change of venue pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 394, subdivision (a) (hereafter section 394(a)). Upon consideration of the petition and preliminary opposition filed by real party in interest R&B Protective Coatings, Inc. (R&B), we issued a Palma notice (Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc. (1984) 36 Cal.3d 171, 180 [203 Cal.Rptr. 626, 681 P.2d 893]), advising the parties that we were considering issuing a peremptory writ of mandate…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. City of Sacramento v. DrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Helvering v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API