Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RAYE, Acting P. J.
The Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District (Golden Gate) seeks a peremptory writ of mandate compelling a change of venue pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 394, subdivision (a) (hereafter section 394(a)). Upon consideration of the petition and preliminary opposition filed by real party in interest R&B Protective Coatings, Inc. (R&B), we issued a Palma notice (Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc. (1984) 36 Cal.3d 171, 180 [203 Cal.Rptr. 626, 681 P.2d 893]), advising the parties that we were considering issuing a peremptory writ of mandate…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Sacramento v. DrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Helvering v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.