Commonwealth v. Shealey
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
Appellant raises three contentions: first, that the police presented insufficient evidence to justify the issuance of a search warrant; second, that the lower court erred in failing to grant reconsideration of post-trial motions based on after-discovered evidence; third, that appellant did not voluntarily and knowingly waive his right to trial by jury. Because none of these contentions are meritorious, we affirm appellant’s conviction.
On October 26, 1972, Officer Earl Buffard of the Pittsburgh Police Department obtained a search warrant permitting a search of appellant’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. LockhartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. VickersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. HuntSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. DysonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. HuntSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978