Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dyson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1977No. 39PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

In a Post Conviction hearing Act petition 1 appellant alleged that the state unconstitutionally used perjured testimony to secure his conviction and that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance because he pressured appellant to waive his right to a jury trial and failed to explain adequately the possible consequences of a jury trial waiver. The lower court dismissed this petition without a hearing. We hold that appellant is entitled to a PCHA hearing on his contention that trial counsel was ineffective because he pressured and advised appellant to waive trial by jury. 2

On…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. West v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. OsborneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. HooksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. WasherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. DockinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API