Legal Opinion

Pringle v. Valdez

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 26, 2007No. 06SC92PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART

2Opinion of the Court · BenderJustice Bender

I. Introduction

We granted certiorari in Valdez v. Pringle, 148 P.3d 1069 (Colo.App.2005), to determine whether the court of appeals correctly affirmed a jury's damages award in this automobile accident case.1 The jury found that Petitioner Debbie Jo Pringle, the defendant in the trial court, was at fault in causing the accident, and awarded Respondent Mark Valdez, the plaintiff in the trial court, $400,000 for physical impairment and disfigurement damages and $100,000 for noneco-nomic damages.

Because Valdez admitted he was not wearing a seatbelt,…

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Trimble v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson/Couvillon v. Nebraska Department of Social ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Giampapa v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  4. Brooke v. Restaurant Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. Carlson v. FerrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by14 opinions

  1. Schuessler v. WolterColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. People v. Sandoval-CandelariaColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. People v. SieckColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. MedvedSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  5. Wahlert v. American Standard InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API