Legal Opinion
Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 21, 2004No. 29549-1-IIPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
98 P.3d 116 (2004)
123 Wash.App. 443
Kurtis and Pamela MAYER, Respondents,
v.
STO INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant.
No. 29549-1-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
September 21, 2004.
James Benjamin Meade, Forsberg & Umlauf, Seattle, WA, Warren J. Daheim, Attorney at Law, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.
Kenneth F. Hobbs, Stafford Frey Cooper, Seattle, WA, Philip Albert Talmadge, Talmadge Law Group PLLC, Tukwila, WA, for Appellant.
BRIDGEWATER, J.
Sto Industries, Inc. appeals the imposition of discovery sanctions and attorney fees after a second trial that we ordered because of newly discovered…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- Bowers v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- Berryman v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Alexander v. SanfordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Duane Young v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.