Legal Opinion

Miller v. Miller

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 18, 1939No. 5 Div. 292PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The bill in this case was filed by appellant and seeks to set aside a decree of divorce on the ground of fraud in its procurement.

The equity of it was sustained by this Court on former appeal—234 Ala. 453, 175 So. 284, 286—to the extent “that there was [alleged to have been] imposition upon the court in representing to the court testimony which in fact was not given by the witness” Gorman Lambert. This was predicated upon allegations in the bill that the decree of divorce was procured by fraud, in that one of the witnesses on whose testimony it was rendered did not appear…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Keenum v. DodsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Hogan v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Jones v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hooke v. HookeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Stewart v. StewartCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  3. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Vaughan v. VaughanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API