Legal Opinion

Fabula v. Buck

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 21, 1979No. 79-1011PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

K. K. HALL, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs in this class action represent aged, blind, or disabled Maryland residents who are considered “medically needy” because their incomes, while high enough to make them ineligible for Supplemental Security Income [SSI] benefits,1 are insufficient to meet the costs of necessary medical services. They challenge a state regulation, applicable to them but not to SSI recipients, under which they were denied Medicaid benefits because they had transferred property for the purpose of receiving Medicaid benefits or circumventing the state’s recovery procedures. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Townsend v. SwankSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Lavine v. MilneSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Aitchison v. BergerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Schisler v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. Ernest E. Avery v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  3. Marcus v. Department of Income MaintenanceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. Rossye Dawson, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Beverlee A. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Owens v. Magee Finance Service of Bogalusa, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API