Legal Opinion
Stephan Riess and Thelma McKinney Riess, and Cross-Appellees v. C. W. Murchison and Simi Valley Development Company, and Cross-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 17, 1964No. 18198_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MacBRIDE, District Judge.
This is a diversity action involving a land sale contract.
Stephan Riess and Thelma McKinney Riess (referred to herein as the sellers) entered into a contract with C. W. Murchison, who subsequently assigned to Simi Valley Development Company (referred to herein as the buyers) for the sale of certain real estate, namely: A three and one-half acre parcel of land in the Simi Valley in Ventura County, California, on which were located a number of wells (referred to herein as the water lands) and, in addition, approximately three hundred subdivided lots in the same area…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rubin v. FuchsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- William A. Cordingley v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Stephan Riess and Thelma McKinney Riess v. C. W. Murchison and Simi Valley Development CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Laborers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California v. Kaufman & Broad Of Northern California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Haas and Haynie CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.