People v. Salcedo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court’s exclusion of defendant’s family during the testimony of the complainant at defendant’s trial on the charge of rape in the first degree did not constitute an abuse of discretion. Here the Trial Judge, having presided over defendant’s pretrial hearings, knew of the embarrassing and sensitive nature of the complainant’s testimony. The court closed the courtroom only during the victim’s testimony for her psychological well-being as well as to foster the truth discovery process (see People v Glover, 60 NY2d 783; People v Joseph, 59…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. PollockNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. GloverNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. JosephNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. DominyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. ClemonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990