Legal Opinion · Dissent
People v. Clemons
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 22, 1990Published
1Dissent
Callahan, J. (dissenting).
I cannot agree with the majority view that the trial court failed to conduct a proper inquiry and failed to articulate a reason for its decision to close the courtroom to the public in this rape trial. The record reveals that prior to the complainant testifying the following colloquy took place:
"the court: Ms. Dougherty, it’s my understanding you’re going to make application to close the Court Room to the public during the testimony of the victim in this case, is that correct, ma’am?
"ms. Dougherty: Yes, Your Honor.
"the court: And that’s as a result of her request to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. GloverNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. JosephNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. DawsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- People v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. SalcedoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.