People v. Glover
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*785OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The trial court’s limited closure of the courtroom during the testimony of complainant in this rape case did not constitute an abuse of discretion or a denial of defendant’s right to a public trial. The Trial Judge, having presided over defendant’s previous trial on the same charges, knew of the embarrassing nature of complainant’s testimony and was aware, in addition, of the “traffic” caused by courthouse employees who, out of curiosity, tended to come in and out of the courtroom during such testimony. No…
2Cited by28 opinions
- James Williams v. Christopher ArtuzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- People v. ColonNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. PetersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. ClemonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. ChaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.