Legal Opinion

State v. Worl

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 21, 1994No. 12471-1-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sweeney, A.C.J.

Billy Wayne Worl, Jr., was convicted by a jury of attempted second degree murder and malicious harassment. The trial court imposed a standard range sentence for the attempted second degree murder. It imposed an exceptional sentence for the malicious harassment offense, citing four aggravating factors including future dangerousness. The court ordered that the sentences run consecutively. The malicious harassment conviction and the exceptional sentence were affirmed by this court in State v. Worl, 58 Wn. App. 443, 794 P.2d 31 (1990). The Washington Supreme Court rejected the use…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Wisconsin v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WorlWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. State v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  5. State v. WorlCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API