Legal Opinion

State v. Lynch

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 25, 1999No. 40048-7-I, 40129-7-I and 40191-2-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

Finding sufficient evidence to prove motiva tion for the assaults and therefore proof of the crimes, we affirm the juvenile court dispositions finding Jeffrey Allen Lynch, Dondrey Levon Whitted, and Aaron Ramone Jefferson guilty of malicious harassment. Under the specific facts of this case, however, and notwithstanding the antimerger clause of the malicious harassment statute, separate punishments for fourth degree simple assault and malicious harassment are an impermissible violation of the appellants’ double jeopardy rights.

FACTS

In the late afternoon of March 9, 1996, M and C, a gay…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. CalleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McKenzy Alfred v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. State v. TIMOTHY K.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. State v. Timothy K.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API