Legal Opinion
Berkowitz v. Philadelphia Chewing Gum Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 22, 1961No. Civ. A. No. 28849PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
This case is before the court on a Motion to Dismiss an Amended Complaint by the guardian of the estate of a minor against the employer of the minor for injuries incurred by the minor during the course of his employment. In paragraph 5 of the Amended Complaint, it is stated that, at the time of the employment, the minor was presumably covered by the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act. Paragraph 9 alleges that immediately following the injury the minor, by his representative, informed defendant and the Pennsylvania Department of Labor that he intended not to make…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Socha v. MetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Anderson v. Carnegie Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Billo v. Allegheny Steel CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Zeitz v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Welsch v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harry Berkowitz, Guardian of the Estate of Wilson Kinch, a Minor, and Wilson Kinch v. Philadelphia Chewing Gum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Bayless v. Philadelphia National League ClubDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Flanagan v. Ethyl Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Harry Berkowitz, Guardian of the Estate of Wilson Kinch, a Minor v. Philadelphia Chewing Gum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
- Kashuba v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Hickox Construction)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.