Legal Opinion

Harry Berkowitz, Guardian of the Estate of Wilson Kinch, a Minor v. Philadelphia Chewing Gum Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 23, 1963No. 14197_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This case was before us on a prior occasion and the judgment rendered in favor of Philadelphia Chewing Gum Corporation was then vacated to the end that certain jurisdictional issues might be decided upon remand. See 303 F.2d 585 (3 Cir., 1962) and 198 F.Supp. 351 (D.C. E.D.Pa.1961). Following the remand on June 4, 1962, a general guardian for the estate of the minor was appointed by the Orphans’ Court of Delaware County, thus correcting the jurisdictional defect pointed out in our opinion. Passing by the issue of the apparent misjoinder of the minor as a plaintiff, as we do here, the court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harry Berkowitz, Guardian of the Estate of Wilson Kinch, a Minor, and Wilson Kinch v. Philadelphia Chewing Gum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  2. Preno v. Connell Anthracite Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
  3. Berkowitz v. Philadelphia Chewing Gum Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McSparran v. WeistCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
  2. Bayless v. Philadelphia National League ClubDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. McSPARRAN v. WEISTCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API