Legal Opinion

Pollock v. McCarty

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1917No. Docket No. 114PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Barry; Smith, J. Bill by James W. Pollock and others against Alonzo McCarty and others to set aside a deed. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

The opinion of the learned trial judge so completely and briefly states the facts that I adopt it:

“The plaintiffs in this case are the nephews of Catherine Rouse, and file this bill as her sole and only heirs at law to set aside a deed made on the 27th day of November, 1901, to Alonzo McCarty, conveying to him the east half of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter, and the east 30 acres of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter, all on section 33, township 8 north, range 9 west, Barry county, Mich., *68containing 50 acres of land, more or less, according to the United States…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thatcher v. Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Andrew's ChurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Taft v. TaftMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Culy v. UphamMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Loomis v. LoomisMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Cooper v. CooperMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gibson v. DymonMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Noakes v. NoakesMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Hynes v. HalsteadMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Resh v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Camp v. Guaranty Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API