Legal Opinion

Ross v. Norton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1950No. 31153PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beals, J.—

Plaintiffs Thomas B. Ross and Mildred Ross, husband and wife, who reside in Tacoma, Washington, are the owners of a tract of land in King county, described as the east one hundred sixty-five feet of government lot 1 and of the southeast quarter, all in section 1, township 21 north, range 3 east W. M. This tract of land is bounded on the north by the shore of Puget Sound and éxtends south approximately twenty-nine hundred feet to the southwest corner of section 6, township 21 north, range 4 east W. M.

The property is improved by a dwelling and outbuildings, located approximately one…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lawson v. HelmichWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Mullally v. ParksWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Jemo v. Tourist Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Harold v. ToomeyWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Fredericksen v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Grays Harbor County v. Bay City Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Ventoza v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  3. Guay v. Washington Natural Gas Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Allen v. MickelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Grays Harbor County v. Bay City Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API