Ross v. Norton
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Beals, J.—
Plaintiffs Thomas B. Ross and Mildred Ross, husband and wife, who reside in Tacoma, Washington, are the owners of a tract of land in King county, described as the east one hundred sixty-five feet of government lot 1 and of the southeast quarter, all in section 1, township 21 north, range 3 east W. M. This tract of land is bounded on the north by the shore of Puget Sound and éxtends south approximately twenty-nine hundred feet to the southwest corner of section 6, township 21 north, range 4 east W. M.
The property is improved by a dwelling and outbuildings, located approximately one…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lawson v. HelmichWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Mullally v. ParksWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Jemo v. Tourist Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Harold v. ToomeyWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Fredericksen v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Grays Harbor County v. Bay City Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
- Ventoza v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Guay v. Washington Natural Gas Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- Allen v. MickelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Grays Harbor County v. Bay City Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.