Legal Opinion

Harold v. Toomey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1916No. 13255PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, French, J., entered May 18, 1915, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action of trespass, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Respondents claimed damages from appellant in the sum of $500 trebled, under the provisions of Rem. & Bal. Code, § 939, for wilful trespass upon their land and the malicious cutting and injuring of a number of their trees and shrubs thereon. The. damages shown by their testimony ranged from $400 to $1,000. The court, sitting without a jury, found that the entry by appellant upon respondents’ land was wilful, that he committed the acts of cutting and injuring the trees and shrubs complained of, and that the damage done was $300, which he trebled and awarded judgment therefor.

I. The judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bailey v. HaydenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Western Dry Goods Co. v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Simons v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State v. GustafsonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Myers-Parr Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Grays Harbor County v. Bay City Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Ventoza v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  3. Mullally v. ParksWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State Ex Rel. Nagle v. NaughtonMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Blake v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API