Legal Opinion

Lion Health Services, Inc. v. Sebelius

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 14, 2011No. 10-10414PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRADO, Circuit Judge:

This appeal concerns the validity of 42 C.F.R. § 418.309(b)(1) (the “Regulation”), a regulation promulgated by the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary”). The Regulation purports to implement 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(i)(2), which establishes a Medicare hospice-care provider’s annual aggregate cap amount for reimbursement purposes. Lion Health Services, Inc. (“Lion”) contends that § 1395f(i)(2) unambiguously requires the Secretary to calculate a provider’s number of beneficiaries per year for annual-reimbursement-cap purposes by allocating…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Full Life Hospice, LLC v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. OCA-Greater Houston v. TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  3. State of Texas v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  4. Arturo Porzecanski v. Alex AzarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  5. Planned Parenthood Southeast, Inc. v. BentleyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API