Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Odneal

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 14, 1914No. 3589PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Murray County; Action by George W. Odneal against Charles M. Bennett and wife. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

This is an ordinary suit on a. promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage on real estate. The note is executed by Chas. M. Bennett alone; the mortgage by both him and Ella M. Bennett, his wife.

The defendants filed answer in the case; the substance of the matter relied upon for a defense being that when the noté became due the payee accepted the accrued interest and extended the time of payment of the note, and did this upon two occasions; and that the wife Ella M. Bennett, who had joined in the execution of the mortgage, did not know of, nor consent to, the extensions ;…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jenness v. CutlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  2. Omlie v. O'TooleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Mahon v. CooleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  4. Hubbard v. OgdenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  5. Roberts v. RobertsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. BahnsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Reeves & Co. v. DyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Kenney v. EblenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Scott v. CoverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API