Legal Opinion

Scott v. Cover

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 29, 1916No. 6570PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; Wade S. Stanfield, Judge. Action by Leola Scott, nee Atkins, against Charles E. Cover and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

This action was brought hy plaintiff in error, hereinafter called plaintiff, against -defendants in error, hereinafter designated defendants, to set aside and hold for naught a certain mortgage, leases, and deeds described in the petition, executed by plaintiff’s husband and by plaintiff and her husband upon lands described in the petition, which said lands constituted the homestead allotment of plaintiff, who Was a duly enrolled Creek citizen by blood. Plaintiff alleges that, at the time of the execution of each of said conveyances made by her and herself and husband,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Schock v. FishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Wimberly v. WinstockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Scott v. BrakelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Success Realty Co. v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Tucker v. ThravesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Winsor v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API