Ness v. Bothell
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, W. H. White, Esq., judge pro tempore, entered April 2, 1908, upon findings in favor of the defendants in an action for an accounting, consolidated with an action by defendants to establish a lien.
1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.
-The above entitled actions were originally begun separately but, at the time of the trial, were consolidated by order of the trial judge. The first action, No. 59.670 in the lower court, was begun by appellant, A. G. Ness, to establish the fact that a copartnership existed between himself and the respondent George Bothell, and after that fact, to enforce an accounting between the copartners, and to obtain such relief as would be incident thereto. George Bothell appeared and, answering, denied the existence of the copartnership, but did not ask for any affirmative relief. Upon the trial of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cunningham v. LakinWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Reese v. MurnanWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Davis v. HinchcliffeWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Smith v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clifford v. CallarmanWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Brown v. HaleyWashington Supreme Court · 1909