Legal Opinion

Reese v. Murnan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1892No. 619PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Cowlitz County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

The main question in this case is, what kind of evidence shall be held sufficient to charge the estate of a deceased person with a resulting trust in real property 1

Thomas Murnan died seized of certain lands in Cowlitz county, comprising a large part of the ‘ ‘ original townsite *375of Kalama,” and Reese, the respondent, has asserted to the satisfaction of the learned superior court that he was entitled to half of it, because he furnished half of the purchase price of the land, under an agreement with Murnan that the title should be the property…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bailey v. HemenwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Fickett v. DurhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tucker v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. In Re the Estate of WitteWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Levy v. SimonWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Lew You Ying v. Lew KayWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Mott v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API