Legal Opinion

Nathan Straus-Duparquet, Inc. v. Moglen

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided July 24, 1945PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.

On the claim that the tenant’s term under a written lease has expired, the landlord brings this proceeding *658to recover possession, of- the premises described in the petition. The landlord requires the premises for its immediate and personal use, it is alleged, in order to have additional space in the building to carry on the manufacture, in large quantities, of certain articles for government use. The proceeding is based on subdivision (d) of section 8 of the Commercial Bent Law, chapter 3 of the Laws of 1945 and the amendment thereof, chapter 315 of the Laws of 1945.

The building in which the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Trade Accessories, Inc. v. BelletNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Cannon v. GordonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1944
  3. Blitzkrieg Amusement Corp. v. Rubenstein Bros.City of New York Municipal Court · 1945
  4. People Ex Rel. Luxemburg Realty Corporation v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. People ex rel. Luxemburg Realty Corp. v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kristel v. SteinbergCity of New York Municipal Court · 1947
  2. Reconstruction Syndicate, Inc. v. SharpeCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946
  3. WMCA, Inc. v. Blockfront Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API