Legal Opinion
Nichols v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 30, 1993No. 2 CA-CV 93-0005PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DRUKE, Chief Judge.
This appeal by State Farm Fire & Casualty Company (State Farm) presents an issue undecided in Arizona. The issue is whether the $100,000/$300,000 bodily injury clause in State Farm’s automobile insurance policy limits its liability to a maximum of $100,000 per person when two or more persons are injured. The trial court decided the issue against State Farm on cross-motions for summary judgment. Our review is de novo. United Bank of Arizona v. Allyn, 167 Ariz. 191, 805 P.2d 1012 (App.1990). We reverse.
State Farm's insured collided head on with the plaintiffs, Mr. and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. HelmeArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, Mich. v. Winget Winget v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, MichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- United Bank of Arizona v. AllynCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mostow v. State Farm Ins. Cos.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArringtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- State v. PintoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. Weitz Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Vencor Inc. v. National States Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.