Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. Gutierrez

California Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 2004No. S111253PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

Upon arresting someone for driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, the arresting officer is required to make a sworn statement to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) setting out all of the relevant information. In Lake v. Reed (1997) 16 Cal.4th 448 [65 Cal.Rptr.2d 860, 940 R2d 311] (Lake), we held that, notwithstanding the predecessor statute to section 13380, an unsworn statement by a nonarresting officer is admissible, pursuant to the public employee record exception to the hearsay rule, at an “administrative per se” review hearing conducted by the DMV. (Lake, at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gikas v. ZolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Lake v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Solovij v. GourleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Dibble v. GourleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Espinoza v. ShiomotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Garamendi v. Golden Eagle InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Brown v. ValverdeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Cal. Dui Lawyers Ass'n v. Cal. Dep't of Motor Vehicles, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Hildebrand v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API