Legal Opinion

Burke v. City & County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 18, 1968No. Civ. 24076PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.

This action for declaratory relief was

dismissed after the sustaining of demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend. Plaintiffs appeal.

Plaintiffs own real property in the Diamond Heights section of San Francisco. Believing the improvements on their lands to be assessed at too high a figure for the 1965-1966 tax year, they applied to the supervisors, sitting as a board of equalization, for reduction. The assessment was reduced by 15 percent. Plaintiffs paid, under protest, the tax due upon this reduced assessment. They then brought this action for declaratory relief, and also commenced a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Monahan v. Department of Water & PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Merkley v. MerkleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Wilson v. Transit AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Conroy v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Foster v. Masters Pontiac Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wilson & Wilson v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Common Wealth Insurance Systems, Inc. v. KerstenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. California State Employees'assn. v. St. of Calif.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Environmental Defense Project v. County of SierraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Teachers Management & Investment Corp. v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API