Legal Opinion
Mich & Mich TGR, Inc. v. Brazabra
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 4, 2015No. 14 Civ. 5758(KAM)(AKT)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MATSUMOTO, District Judge.
Mich & Mich. TGR, Inc. (“plaintiff’) commenced this action alleging that defendant Brazabra, Corp. (“defendant” or “Brazabra”) are infringing upon plaintiffs “Bra Strap Retainer,” U.S. Reissue Patent No. 43,766 by, inter alia, knowingly and willingly importing into the United States, selling, and causing to be sold, and offering for sale within this judicial district and elsewhere, retainers for brassiere straps that infringe upon plaintiffs patents without plaintiffs permission or authorization. (ECF No. 1, Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 8-11, dated…
2Cases cited111 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- LG Capital Funding, LLC v. 5Barz Int'l, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Mich & Mich Tgr, Inc. v. Brazabra CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Olaf Soot Design, LLC v. Daktronics, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Coconut Grove Pads, Inc. v. Mich & Mich TGR, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Artec Europe S.À.R.L. v. Shenzhen Creality 3D Technology Co., Ltd., and Shenzhen Jimuyida Technology Co., Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.