Legal Opinion

Gobler v. Auto-Owners Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1987No. 76011, (Calendar No. 13)PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArcher, J.

This case requires judicial discovery of the intent of the Legislature concerning a provision of the no-fault automobile insurance act. MCL 500.3101 et seq.; MSA 24.13101 et seq.

We granted leave to appeal to determine the meaning of the expression "contributions of tangible things of economic value . . . that dependents of the deceased . . . would have received for support during their dependency from the deceased if the deceased had not suffered the accidental bodily injury causing death” as used in § 3108 of the act. MCL 500.3108; MSA 24.13108. We read the quoted language of § 3108 in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Tuttle v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. City of Grand Rapids v. CrockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Dussia v. MONROE CTY. EMP. RET. SYS.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Dussia v. Monroe County Employees Retirement SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Turner v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. BewersdorfMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Heather Lynn Hannay v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Ross v. Auto Club GroupMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Reed v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API