Legal Opinion
Gerhard & Hey, Inc. v. Cattaraugus Tanning Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 12, 1926PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcLaughlin, J.
This is an appeal by permission of this court from a judgment of the Appellate Division, first department, unanimously affirming a verdict directed in favor of the defendant.
The action was brought to recover the value of work, labor and services alleged to have been performed by the plaintiff in connection with the transportation of certain leather from Brooklyn to a steamship lying alongside a pier in New York, consigned to J. Anderson & Co., Inc., at Copenhagen, Denmark. The leather consisted of 360 bales. While the same was being transferred from Brooldyn to New York 38 of the bales were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Jackson Architectural Iron Works v. HurlbutNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- W. N. Stevenson & Co. v. HartmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commercial Molasses Corp. v. New York Tank Barge Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- McIntyre v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Commercial Molasses Corp. v. New York Tank Barge Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Vumbaca v. Terminal One Group Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Weaver v. Public Service CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.