Legal Opinion

Bartosiewicz v. Cieszynski

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1932PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The sole question upon this appeal is whether the findings are sustained by the evidence, and it is *354the conclusion of the court that the judgment herein should be affirmed without opinion. This memorandum is filed solely for the purpose of calling attention to an impropriety upon the part of the attorney for the respondent. Mr. Adamkiewicz drafted the will in question, was an important witness upon .the issue of undue influence, and must have anticipated in advance of the trial that his presence as a witness would be required. It appears from the record that he nevertheless appeared and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Interior Woodwork Co. v. BuhlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lorenz v. WolffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. In Re Torstensen's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Boyle v. KempkinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Weinert v. First State Bank of West BendWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Bermke v. Security First National Bank of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API