Boyle v. Kempkin
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
Under the facts of the case as stated above, we must determine whether a valid irrevocable trust was created or whether this was only an arrangement for a testamentary disposition of Giesing’s property. While trusts frequently have what Mr. Justice Holmes described as “a very testamentary look” (Bromley v. Mitchell, 155 Mass. 509, 30 N. E. 83), still the distinction between an intention to create a trust inter vivos and one to arise only on the death of the settlor which is invalid unless the requirements of the statute of wills are followed is discernible.
The land in question is in Wisconsin…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gardner v. City National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Goodrich v. City National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Bromley v. MitchellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Interior Woodwork Co. v. BuhlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Riehl v. BingenheimerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Garner v. WolfinbargerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Estate of Prudowsky v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
- Sutherland v. PiernerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
- In re the Estate of ServiceNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965
- Janura v. FenclWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.