Legal Opinion
Cutting v. Bullerdick
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 16, 1949No. 12324_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Chief Judge.
This is a motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the District Court for the Territory of Alaska entered on April 8, 1949, ordering the sale of certain property upon the ground that no notice of appeal was filed within thirty days after April 8, 1949, there being no extension by the district court of the thirty-day period within which the appeal could be taken as provided in Section 2107 of Title 28, United States Code, Annotated'.
Appellant filed on May 4, 1949, a notice of a motion later considered, which appellants contended is a notice of appeal, and sought a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Taylor v. VossSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Prudence Securities Advisory GroupSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Crump v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Brandies v. CochraneSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Martin v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harold Yanow v. Weyerhaeuser Steamship Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Sam Rabin v. Henry Cohen, B & H Processing Co., and Peterson Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Patrick Mahon McGee v. Frank Eyman, Superintendent, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Cel-A-Pak v. California Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Cel-A-Pak v. California Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.