Legal Opinion
Cel-A-Pak v. California Agricultural Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 2, 1982No. 79-4743PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
Cel-A-Pak, which harvests and packs cauliflower for independent growers, brought this action against the California Agricultural Labor Relations Board (“ALRB”) and the United Farm Workers of America (“UFW”) to prevent assertion by the ALRB of jurisdiction over Cel-A-Pak’s employees and to recover damages from UFW for injuries allegedly caused by secondary boycotts. On motion for summary judgment, the district court dismissed the claim against ALRB on the ground no justiciable controversy presently existed because appellant was not subject to threatened or actual injury by the potential…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Walter J. Cobb, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Jerry LewisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Thomas E. Blunt v. United States of America, Thomas E. Blunt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Debbie Fiester, an Individual v. Allan TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Joseph Buffalo v. Franklin Sunn, Director D.S.S.H.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Bullock v. SweeneyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1986
- Portland Federal Employees Credit Union, a Non-Profit Corporation v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Cel-A-Pak v. California Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.