Legal Opinion

Fernald v. Spokane & British Columbia Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1903No. 4364PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County. — Hon. William E. Rici-iardson, Judge,

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mount, J.

— On August 21, 1901, the respondent commenced an action in the superior court of Spokane county against the Spokane & British Columbia Telephone & Telegraph Company, the Inland Telephone & Telegraph Company, and the Pacifie States Telephone & Telegraph Company, defendants in this action praying for a receiver for the first-named company, and for damages against the other two companies. Thereafter, on September 18, 1901, upon motion of plaintiff, one A. D. Campbell was appointed receiver of all the property of the said Spokane & British…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Howell v. RipleyNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  2. Lowell v. DoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. State v. Jacksonville, Pensacola & Mobile RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1875
  4. O'Mahoney v. . BelmontNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. St. Louis Car Co. v. Stillwater Street Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adler v. SeamanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  2. State v. ZennerWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Bailey & Collins v. Ryan Cotton Oil Mill Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. McDougall v. HepdenWashington Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API